environment

global warming made simple

antarchi's picture
'When you go home, do please make sure that you have a look in your parents' bathroom cabinets, and tell them that any spray deodorants they have need to be thrown away, because every time they use a spray deodorant, that has consequences for the earth, and for your futures. The deodorants are wearing away the ozone layer, and that layer is getting very thin now. And you know, the other thing that is making the earth heat up is your fridges: when they are turned on, they also damage the ozone layer, because they give out the same chemicals.'

do we need a plan?

antarchi's picture
* * *

ecofanatics

With thanks to Rising Tide

climate racism

antarchi's picture

There was something particularly sobering about the map I included in a previous post - quite apart from the sheer numbers. Even if I know that it is not the richer nations that will bear the brunt of climate change, seeing it in such graphical form, already happening, suddenly makes it graphically clear why the richer nations are not in any hurry to do anything; and makes it graphically difficult to know how we can make them.

Why on earth should it matter to anyone in this country, let alone the government, that Africans, Asians and South Americans are going to die in their millions from climate change, if it doesn't matter that they are dying in their millions now, from starvation, from the bombs we send them, from the weapons we sell them, from the debt we load on them - and from the carbon effects of our mad and luxurious lifestyles, a world away. There is nothing in British government policy - and never has been - to suggest that the concerns or lives of people in the South count for anything at all: they are treated as expendable, resources at our disposal to be used as we think best. Very occasionally they are used in PR drives to earn some brownie points among the British population.

But if the government won't take anything except their chance of re-election seriously, can the public come to stop denying the link between our actions and the lives of other people in the world; and can it be made to care enough about those other people to change the actions? And then even if they - we - can make those two great leaps of understanding, can we stop ourselves backsliding later on?

The human mind has an extraordinary capacity to hold conflicting thoughts in separate compartments, to bury uncomfortable truths, and to rationalise what cannot and should not be rationalised. We know it is wrong, we know that most of us could make it less wrong by making alterations to our lifestyles that need not be radical enough to tip us into anything approaching hardship. And yet I catch myself wondering if I can justify one more flight to Georgia, and another one to Russia... Before Christmas.

For those who want to sin, and still feel good about themselves, I cannot recommend strongly enough cheatneutral.com - an innovative (and lucrative) approach to solving the world's escalating levels of despicable behaviour.

14 more planets

antarchi's picture

...if the whole world wished to consume at the level of the United States - a consumption pattern which has been fuelled, incidentally, by the credit binge which led to the current economic crisis - we would need, conservatively, over 5 planets like earth to support them. But, under the current pattern of unequally distributed benefits from growth, to lift everyone in the world onto a modest $3 per day, would require the resources of around 15 planets like ours. Where, you might ask, will the other 14 come from?

— Andrew Simms

the poor need more rich men

antarchi's picture

... for the poor to get slightly less poor, the rich have to get very much richer, implying patterns of consumption which, in a world facing climate change, cannot be sustained. It now takes around $166 worth of global growth - made up of all those energy-hungry giant flat screen TVs and sports utility vehicles - to generate a single dollar of poverty reduction for people in absolute poverty, compared with just $45 dollars in the 1980s.

— Andrew Simms

junk mail

antarchi's picture

* Junk mail in the U.S. accounts for one-third of all the mail delivered in the world
* More than 100,000,000,000 pieces of junk mail are delivered each year (that’s more than 800 pieces per household)
* The greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the manufacturing of the 6.5 million tons of paper required for junk mail annually is equivalent to the greenhouse gas emissions of 3.7 million cars
* More than 100 million trees a year are cut down and made into paper for junk mail. Those trees come from endangered forests like Canada’s Boreal and Indonesia’s rainforests

— From Do Not Mail

Syndicate content